Відео

Marcelo é uma grande referência. Que prazer chegar nessa conferência e poder ouví-lo!

The research of Sabine´s group about superfluid DM has brought up a lot of new impulses how to think about the phenomenon, still important in 2024. Sabine is a great scientist and communicator and a wonderful human being. Thanks a lot for uploading this!

Of course the Dark Matter is real. Every card in a house of cards is real. Every card depends on every other card simultaneously. And one of the cards is your career as well. The EU model destroys a lot of careers and life achievements. It's nice. Who cares.

SI EL UNIVERSO SE COMPORTA COMO UN GRAN HOLOGRAMA Y NOSOTROS TAMBIÉN SOMOS OTRO GÉNERO HOMÍNIDO HOMO-HOLOGRAMANS, TODOS SOMOS UNA PROYECCIÓN QUE VIENE DE OTRA FUENTE, DESDE DONDE SOMOS PROYECTADOS. Y LA PROYECCIÓN DE CADA UNO, VIENE DE ESA FUENTE QUE ESTÁ EN LOS FUTUROS POTENCIALES Y EN ESE ESTADO LUMINOSO EN REALIDAD ESTAMOS ESENCIALMENTE EN PLENA ENERGÍA, EN ESE ESTADO YA HEMOS LLEGADO Y ALCANZADO LA PLENITUD DEL SER, EL ARQUETIPO LUMINOSO DONDE SOMOS PARTE DE LA CONSCIENCIA DIVINA, UN ESTADO DEL SER QUE DE VEZ EN CUANDO SE NOS PRESENTA EN LOS SUEÑOS, O BIEN SOMOS LO QUE SIEMPRE HEMOS SOÑADO. EN REALIDAD EN ESA FUENTE DE PROYECCIÓN SOMOS NOSOTROS MISMOS, LOS QUE NOS ESTAMOS PROYECTANDO, DESDE ESE ESTADO CON LA VERDADERA NATURALEZA LUMINOSA. DONDE LOS ANTIGUOS DESIGNAN EL MOMENTO CUANDO DEL TODO VENIMOS A SER MÚLTIPLES Y VOLVEMOS A SER EL UNO. ASI TAMBIÉN CUANDO DESDE ESE ESTADO DE SER MÚLTIPLES LO QUE SUCEDE EN REALIDAD ES LA PRESENCIA AUN INCONSCIENTE, AUNQUE SE LA INTUYE PERO NO SE LA ENTIENDE, ES CUANDO NUESTROS DOBLES CUÁNTICOS, SIENDO NOSOTROS MISMOS, LOS QUE ESTAMOS NACIENDO POR SEGUNDA VEZ, TOMANDO CONCIENCIA DEL SER FRACTAL MULTIDIMENSIONAL.. DONDE SOMOS MÚLTIPLES Y UNO A LA MISMA VEZ, ES AHÍ QUE VAMOS VIAJANDO, EN ESTADO DE ONDA, VAMOS HIPERINCURSIONANDO POR EL CAMPO CUÁNTICO .... DONDE TODO ESTÁ SUCEDIENDO AHORA EN DIFERENTES TIEMPOS, EN FORMA SIMULTÁNEA Y SIGUIENDO LA ESTRUCTURAS HOLOGRÁFICAS. COMO EL ALEPH DE BORGES CON FORMAS DE ORBES TOROIDALES . HEMOS LLEGADO A UN FIN DE UNA ETAPA PARA LA HUMANIDAD SALIR DEL ESTADO EMBRIONARIO Y LATENTE Y CONTINUAR CON LOS NUEVOS EVENTOS QUE TENEMOS DESTINADO A SER. Y VER QUE HAY UN HORIZONTE DESPLEGADO, MÁS ALLÁ DE NUESTROS PROPIOS LÍMITES, MÁS ALLÁ DE LAS PERCEPCIONES QUE SUPONEMOS QUE EXISTEN, EN ESE NUEVO HORIZONTE DESPLEGADO HAY UNIVERSOS Y MUNDOS ALTERNOS PARA VER Y VIVIR. N REALIDAD LO QUE DEBEMOS DARNOS CUENTA, ES QUE NUESTRA CONCIENCIA ESTÁ CRECIENDO MÁS ALLÁ DE LOS LÍMITES IMPUESTOS POR SIGLOS DE MENTIRAS ORGANIZADAS, PARA QUE NO NOS DEMOS CUENTA QUE EL PODER Y LAS POSIBILIDADES ESTÁN DENTRO DE NOSOTROS MISMOS. COMO TANTAS VECES HE SOSTENIDO, QUE HAY QUE ENTRAR EN EL SILENCIO INTERIOR SOSTENIDO PARA QUE SE ABRAN Y ACTIVEN LAS NUEVAS PERCEPCIONES Y DESCUBRIR QUE EXISTEN, Y CONVIVEN CON NOSOTROS SITIOS Y ESTADOS DE PERCEPCIONES QUE NOS LLEVAN A ABRIR LOS PORTALES QUE YA ESTÁN ESPERANDO SER ATRAVESADOS, ACTIVANDO DESDE DENTRO Y ESPERANDO EL SALTO FRECUENCIAL CUÁNTICO. MEDIANTE EL SILENCIO INTERIOR SOSTENIDO PODEMOS HACER UN SALTO FRECUENCIAL CUÁNTICO INTERNO Y ASÍ COMO DECÍAN LOS ANTIGUOS SOBRE EL MERKABAC O EL CUERPO TOROIDAL ES POR EL MEDIO DE PODER REALIZAR VIAJES INTERDIMENSIONALES O POR OTRO UNIVERSO ALTERNOS. SE PUEDE VIAJAR NO POR LA LUZ SINO POR LA OSCURIDAD QUE YA ESTÁ PRESENTE AHORA Y POR TODO EL UNIVERSO COMO UN GRAN LÍQUIDO AMNIÓTICO DE LAS GALAXIAS. ES POR ESO QUE YA NO HACE FALTA IR A LA VELOCIDAD DE LA LUZ O MÁS SINO POR MEDIO DE CAMBIOS FRECUENCIAL CUÁNTICO DE NOSOTROS EN MODULACIÓN Y ENTRELAZAMIENTO CON EL PUNTO DE DESTINO DONDE QUEREMOS LLEGAR. AL REALIZARSE EL CAMBIO FRECUENCIAL DE MANERA SIMULTÁNEA SE LLEGA AL PUNTO DESTINO QUE TIENE LA MISMA FRECUENCIA QUE DEBEMOS MODULAR, PARA HACER EL VIAJE.

😅😅 it wasn't a rock, and the oceans will boil but it won't be because of that bs green house effect... sorry but you're completely wrong.

But is dark matter behavomg like a perfect gas ? Could it be quantum fluctuations at Planck length ? Sorry I have no more university backing me up but using a mass équivalent of Planck energy fits with less parameters

Nicely done. Informative and enjoyable. Plus you used that NASA animation that rotates into an H-R diagram. I smile every time that.

Son mentiras de mentiras siempre an visto casos y no lo divulgan y mienten jj Benítez el peruano dijo q la NASA va a desmentir y no dejar difundir

El volcán chileno q hay contrucción en el reborde y interiores y no se pronuncia as de años y no lo comunican y hay contrucciónes en el volcán de milenios

Se dice q se puede ver aunó caminando y no ven nada de nada raro

This just plain embarrassing. Electricity in plasma environment, thats all they need to know. The 3D infinite universe is electricity in a plasma environment, designed by frequency, vibration. energy, modulation in a fractal aether medium. There is nothing sinister about how it all works, its the opposite. The human body is a classic example of how everything works ( just read above again ).....it could be a tree or a solar system, same principles.

for a long time: they are priests. The priests of modernity. It isn’t science. Ignoring papers and tests isn’t science. I feel so bad for Pavel Kroupa. Here’s a brilliant guy who was taught the scientific method and he’s very good at what he does, namely, stellar dynamics. He’s extremely prolific and knowledgeable. And for the 10 years or more he has been trying to convince the faithful to become scientists again. It’s just incredible that we can have a sociological phenomenon of mass cognitive dissonance insulated by everyone who has built their careers on this, been awarded Nobel prizes, been hailed as geniuses etc. as this model has been disproven in so many different ways. It has been disproven in more ways more times than any theory humanity has ever scientifically investigated. never in the history of the scientific method has an idea been so thoroughly contradicted and disproven through peer review publication while still being propagated, disseminated, heralded, boastfully explained and studied nonetheless.

11:00 29:00 forms

No es coincidencia que nada salga de su espacio q cuenta la historia mirando más allá sabes q de lnfinito no tengas temor todo esta seguro lo siente tu cuerpo lo ven tus familiares y lo viven tus sueños echos más q deseo

Sabine, gentlemen and ladies, Dark Matter is real. And so is Dark Energy. But both cannot solve the conundrum of Quantum Gravity in physics. Only An empirical Quantum Gravity theory would. And it will also complete our understanding of how and why Gravity works and it will debunk and invalidate String Theory, Loop Quantum Gravity, M Theory, Theory of General Relativity and all failed and wrong theories of gravity. But it will proved and validate Einstein's Hidden Variables and EPR's authors Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen correct. The Hidden variables are: Quantum Gravity, Quantum Anti-Gravity, Quantum Neutral Gravity, the macroscopic cosmic scale Gravitational Quantum Entanglement and Gravitational Quantum Computation. All these would complete the Quantum Foundation, Unification of Gravity with Quantum Mechanics and the realization of Theory of Everything in Physics. I have discovered and cracked the code of the true nature of Gravity in my over 30 years of basic research works in Singapore. This discovery/invention/theory of mine include THE GOD EQUATION - THE TRINITY Equations, Laws and Codes For QUANTUM GRAVITATION , QUANTUM GRAVITATIONAL ENTANGLE MENT and GRAVITATIONAL QUANTUM COMPUTATION that pave the way for Theory of Everything in Physics: - THE 3-in-1 HOLY GRAILS of Physics: 1. Quantum Anti-Gravity/Spin Up Quantum Gravitational Entanglement/0 Rhu Bit or R Bit: QAG = ∆QGOρ < ∆QGFρ = ↑α 2. Quantum Gravity/Spin Down Quantum Gravitational Entanglement/1 Rhu Bit or R Bit: QG = ∆QGOρ > ∆QGFρ = ↓α 3. Quantum Neutral Gravity/Superposition Quantum Gravitational Entanglement/01 and/or 10 Rhu Bit or R Bit: QNG = ∆QGOρ = ∆QGFρ = ↑↓α We now have a working Quantum Theory of Gravity that is testable and complete with reproducible empirical experiments with the same results if repeated over and over again and again, confirmed by empirical observations in nature with 7-Sigma level results, guided by empirical Laws, Cosmic/Universal Computation and physical/mathematical Trinity God Equations that are predictive, precise and does no collapse even in high energies of Big Bang and singularity of Black Hole. FYI: Quantum Gravity or Quantum Gravitation have three types that are equivalent to and manifested by Quantum Computational Gravitation- the biggest and most powerful Computer Software Program and Hardware in the Universe and Quantum Gravitational Entanglement - a Quantum Entanglement at Macroscopic Cosmic Scale namely: 1. Quantum Anti-Gravity = Spin Up Quantum Entanglement State; 2. Quantum Neutral Gravity = Superposition Quantum Entanglement State; and 3. Quantum Gravity = Spin Down Quantum Entanglement State. More detailed information could be found on the published papers 2 years ago in London, Paris, and Zurich, online and at the two scientific Journals ACADEMIA and REAL TRUE NATURE. Alternatively, you can google the name of the author ROEL REAL ROVIRA to arrive at the published paper on Quantum Gravity. Most recently, additional two well respected scientific journals namely NATURE and the AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY APS Physical Review Journals have officially invited this author to submit manuscripts on his Research on Quantum Gravity for publication for PRX QUANTUM in preparation for a celebration for International Year of Quantum IYQ 2025 to showcase the best papers of the year. Quantum Gravitation is governed by and follow the Trinity Laws, Mathematics and Physics of Quantum Gravitation, Gravitational Quantum Computation and Quantum Gravitational Entanglement. We now have a new Laws of Physics and two newly discovered Fundamental Forces of Nature - The Quantum Neutral Gravity and Quantum Anti-Gravity which completed the heart of the Quantum Theory of Gravity published in London. Paris and Zurich last December 2022 as follows: 1. First Law of Quantum Gravitation: Rovira’s Universal Law of Quantum Gravitation: “The greater mass density of gravitating Quantum Objects than the Quantum Gravitational Field causes a downward acceleration of the Quantum Objects in a Quantum Gravitational Field instantaneously mediated by Graviton.” - Roel Real Rovira Equation for Quantum Gravity, and Spin Down Quantum Gravitational Entanglement: QG = ∆QGOρ > ∆QGFρ = ↓α Where: QG is Quantum Gravity in Rovira (value of downward acceleration force due to quantum gravity) in kg. ∆QGOρ is Differential Change in greater mass density of Quantum Gravitating Objects than the mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3. ∆QGFρ is Differential Change in mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3. ↓α is the Resultant Downward Acceleration of Gravitating Quantum Objects in mtr/sec. 2. Second Law of Quantum Gravitation: Rovira’s Universal Law of Quantum Anti-Gravity. “The lesser mass density of gravitating Quantum Objects than the Quantum Gravitational Field causes an upward acceleration of the Quantum Objects in a Quantum Gravitational Field instantaneously mediated by Graviton.” -Roel Real Rovira Equation for Quantum Anti-Gravity/Spin Up Quantum Gravitational Entanglement: QAG = ∆QGOρ < ∆QGFρ = ↑α Where: QAG is Quantum Anti-Gravity in Rovira (value of upward acceleration force due to quantum anti-gravity) in kg. ∆QGOρ is Differential Change in lesser mass density of Quantum Anti-Gravitating Objects than the mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3. ∆QGFρ is Differential Change in mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3. ↑α is the Resultant Upward Acceleration of Anti-Gravitating Quantum Objects in mtr/sec. 3. Third Law of Quantum Gravitation: Rovira’s Law of Quantum Neutral Gravitation. “The equal mass density of gravitating Quantum Objects and the Quantum Gravitational Field causes a zero acceleration or floating or hoovering of the gravitating Quantum Objects in a Quantum Gravitational Field, instantaneously mediated by Graviton.” - Roel real Rovira Equation for Quantum Neutral Gravity and Superposition Quantum Gravitational Entanglement: QNG = ∆QGOρ = ∆QGFρ = ↑↓α Where: QNG is Quantum Neutral Gravity in Rovira (value of zero acceleration force due to quantum neutral gravity) in kg. ∆QGOρ is Differential Change in equal mass density of Quantum Neutral Gravitating Objects to the mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3. ∆QGFρ is Differential Change in mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3. ↑↓0α is the Resultant zero acceleration or non-acceleration of Neutral Gravitating Quantum Objects in mtr/sec. For more detailed information on these 3-in-1 Trinity Laws and Equations for Quantum Gravitation, Gravitational Quantum Computation, and Quantum Gravitational Entanglement - The Real True Nature of Quantum Gravitation, look it up at the two scientific journals ACADEMIA and REAL TRUE NATURE or google the name of the author ROEL REAL ROVIRA. Copyright 2022 ROEL REAL ROVIRA. All Rights Reserved.

No, it is not.

MOND is a phenomenon that only works if there are separate versions of gravity at other places and circumstances in the universe. That's a dodge. Meanwhile we have plenty of physical evidence that dark matter has footprints in collider technology. The evidence of dark matter is overwhelming. Sadly the evidence for the standard model particle of dark matter is completely lacking. Here's the problem. Dark Matter has been around for far longer than standard model particles. Since they are so old and slow moving and neutral and massive they are not found just anywhere. In fact they tend to be found only at the centers of large massive objects like stars and planets and moons and the like. Otherwise, they are found in the halos of galaxies. The exception would seem to be large massive yet fragmented objects, such as the asteroid belt protoplanet between Mars and Jupiter. The masses of dark matter particles may well have several varieties from the least massive and youngest to the most massive and oldest. The least massive and youngest may well fall into the logarithmic scale proportional to that between Gravity and Electromagnetism. This is the hierarchical scale with Hadronic and Leptonic quarks at one end, the bottom end of this scale. This spans 10^36 in a scale proportional to the relative number of dimensions applying to this scale. Clearly there must be several dimensions in this scale. Approximately 7 dimensions seems to be the least massive divisision of this logarithmic scale that makes any sense. Applying a natural scale suggests that at minimum 1/18 of 36 or about 10^2 times as massive as quarks for the least massive initial stages or types of forms of dark matter, while 1/7 of 36 or about 10^5 or more times as massive as quarks for the most massive forms of the initial stages or types of dark matter. Consequentially, small quantities of this novel form of dark matter should be able to be detected, then found, isolated, formally discovered, transported, refined and manufactured. Obviously research and developments in the asteroid belt are going to be instrumental in this discovery. The slow pace of space exploration seems to mean that it's going to be a while before we get this discovery at long last. Of course, the future of dark matter doesn't really begin until its formal discovery, so we'll have to wait till then, whenever that may be. part 2 Ok. So the Chrysanthemum or Mum, sometimes called the Mon when depicted in art, can now be understood in terms of highly temporary but sometimes long lived quark models. It is sometimes well established that early versions of the mum were constricted within 2 dimensions. They were strongly limited, apparently limited to about 21 petals, as predicted by Fibonnacci. However, in later Mon depictions, full blown 3 dimensional mums have been depicted and are apparently grown and are flourishing. These are much larger than previous 2 dimensional models. In counterpart, quark models in the standard model have far exceeded the dark matter models contemplated. For instance, Charm quarks are over 600 times larger than standard Up quarks, and Bottom quarks are over 400 times bigger than standard Strange quarks. In previous models of the Fibonacci model of quark expansion, the numbers (10^2 to 10^5) are well known and within the known potential of this dimension of dark matter. We can expect this dimension of dark matter stable components within isolated dark matter, such as within isolated galactic halos. However, trapped dark matter components such as within stars, planets and moons may be decaying quickly, as exhibited by our own Moon, which has shut down and become locked in its gravitationally stabilized orbit, and the planets Mercury and perhaps even Mars, which apparently have also slowed down, and headed for stopping. This energetic model is shocking, and further dark matter and similar quark models, may be decaying or already gone, so the Mum/Mon model will be an important strategic exploration and investigation. I like the Chrysanthemum model for quarks anyway. It depicts the exponential growth of standard model quarks that we have already seen. However, I think we will see a plateauing of such quark expansions, I think the upper limit of further discoveries such as within the Cern Large Hadron Collider may be reached at about 10,000 times the mass of standard model Up quarks. Spoiler Alert: There may be some new quarks within this range. However, some dimensions or ranges of dark matter quarks may already have expired and would only be available at galactic scales of discovery and investigation. So dark matter research may still have local frontiers to discover, but may stall at this range. The good news is that we have an extremely long time to do this research and discovery of standard model quarks before dark energy expansion catches up with us. Relax. It's cool. I hope that you have enjoyed this Fibonacci mathematical Chrysanthemum experiment in both quarks and dark matter. Thank you for reading. part 3 Ok. So we are now assuming the Fibonnacci based Chrysanthemum model of hyperdimensional dark matter and quarks. Or we still have sluggards or Luddites who can't keep up. In this assumptive model, this structure suggests that such matter would be in the range of 10^5 to 10^8 times the mass of standard model quarks. For regular folks this is from 10,000 times to 100,000,000 times this mass. That is really close to the neutron star category of matter. While this may be amusing consider where this is going, the next phase of dark matter and as yet undiscovered quark masses would have to be in the range of 10^13 to 10^21, or 1,000,000,000,000 to 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 quark masses. Is this in the range of black holes yet? Or are we still stalled at very large neutron stars? Again we must pause and consider where we are. The first stages of dark matter is from 10^2 to 10^3 masses, the 2nd stage would be from 10^3 to 10^5 masses, the 3rd stage would be from 10^5 to 10^8 masses, and the 4th stage would be from 10^8 masses to 10^13 masses. Whew. Theoretically the 5th stage of dark matter would be 10^13 to 10^21 masses. That still leaves us with the 6th stage of the mass of dark matter and quarks. This is the staggering number of 10^21 to 10^34 masses for quarks and dark matter. Wow. This is clearly the end of our Chrysanthemum dark matter models. It is also the end of our hierarchical mass models. What comes after the end of our Electromagnetism model? I dare not postulate. But I suspect outer space models of dark energy. This is the incredible range of from 10^34 to 10^55 masses, a gut wrenching number times the mass of standard model quarks. This is the amount of masses that represents the beginning or the ending of the universe. It's not just a black hole. It's the end. Sorry - not sorry.

Mond does not solve anything unless gravity is just different in specific locations. If that doesn't sound ridiculous to you then you're not paying attention. Dark matter is still the best idea among these choices. The evidence of dark matter is overwhelming. Sadly the evidence for the standard model particle of dark matter is completely lacking. Here's the problem. Dark Matter has been around for far longer than standard model particles. Since they are so old and slow moving and neutral and massive they are not found just anywhere. In fact they tend to be found only at the centers of large massive objects like stars and planets and moons and the like. Otherwise, they are found in the halos of galaxies. The exception would seem to be large massive yet fragmented objects, such as the asteroid belt protoplanet between Mars and Jupiter. The masses of dark matter particles may well have several varieties from the least massive and youngest to the most massive and oldest. The least massive and youngest may well fall into the logarithmic scale proportional to that between Gravity and Electromagnetism. This is the hierarchical scale with Hadronic and Leptonic quarks at one end, the bottom end of this scale. This spans 10^36 in a scale proportional to the relative number of dimensions applying to this scale. Clearly there must be several dimensions in this scale. Approximately 7 dimensions seems to be the least massive divisision of this logarithmic scale that makes any sense. Applying a natural scale suggests that at minimum 1/18 of 36 or about 10^2 times as massive as quarks for the least massive initial stages or types of forms of dark matter, while 1/7 of 36 or about 10^5 or more times as massive as quarks for the most massive forms of the initial stages or types of dark matter. Consequentially, small quantities of this novel form of dark matter should be able to be detected, then found, isolated, formally discovered, transported, refined and manufactured. Obviously research and developments in the asteroid belt are going to be instrumental in this discovery. The slow pace of space exploration seems to mean that it's going to be a while before we get this discovery at long last. Of course, the future of dark matter doesn't really begin until its formal discovery, so we'll have to wait till then, whenever that may be. part 2 Ok. So the Chrysanthemum or Mum, sometimes called the Mon when depicted in art, can now be understood in terms of highly temporary but sometimes long lived quark models. It is sometimes well established that early versions of the mum were constricted within 2 dimensions. They were strongly limited, apparently limited to about 21 petals, as predicted by Fibonnacci. However, in later Mon depictions, full blown 3 dimensional mums have been depicted and are apparently grown and are flourishing. These are much larger than previous 2 dimensional models. In counterpart, quark models in the standard model have far exceeded the dark matter models contemplated. For instance, Charm quarks are over 600 times larger than standard Up quarks, and Bottom quarks are over 400 times bigger than standard Strange quarks. In previous models of the Fibonacci model of quark expansion, the numbers (10^2 to 10^5) are well known and within the known potential of this dimension of dark matter. We can expect this dimension of dark matter stable components within isolated dark matter, such as within isolated galactic halos. However, trapped dark matter components such as within stars, planets and moons may be decaying quickly, as exhibited by our own Moon, which has shut down and become locked in its gravitationally stabilized orbit, and the planets Mercury and perhaps even Mars, which apparently have also slowed down, and headed for stopping. This energetic model is shocking, and further dark matter and similar quark models, may be decaying or already gone, so the Mum/Mon model will be an important strategic exploration and investigation. I like the Chrysanthemum model for quarks anyway. It depicts the exponential growth of standard model quarks that we have already seen. However, I think we will see a plateauing of such quark expansions, I think the upper limit of further discoveries such as within the Cern Large Hadron Collider may be reached at about 10,000 times the mass of standard model Up quarks. Spoiler Alert: There may be some new quarks within this range. However, some dimensions or ranges of dark matter quarks may already have expired and would only be available at galactic scales of discovery and investigation. So dark matter research may still have local frontiers to discover, but may stall at this range. The good news is that we have an extremely long time to do this research and discovery of standard model quarks before dark energy expansion catches up with us. Relax. It's cool. I hope that you have enjoyed this Fibonacci mathematical Chrysanthemum experiment in both quarks and dark matter. Thank you for reading. part 3 Ok. So we are now assuming the Fibonnacci based Chrysanthemum model of hyperdimensional dark matter and quarks. Or we still have sluggards or Luddites who can't keep up. In this assumptive model, this structure suggests that such matter would be in the range of 10^5 to 10^8 times the mass of standard model quarks. For regular folks this is from 10,000 times to 100,000,000 times this mass. That is really close to the neutron star category of matter. While this may be amusing consider where this is going, the next phase of dark matter and as yet undiscovered quark masses would have to be in the range of 10^13 to 10^21, or 1,000,000,000,000 to 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 quark masses. Is this in the range of black holes yet? Or are we still stalled at very large neutron stars? Again we must pause and consider where we are. The first stages of dark matter is from 10^2 to 10^3 masses, the 2nd stage would be from 10^3 to 10^5 masses, the 3rd stage would be from 10^5 to 10^8 masses, and the 4th stage would be from 10^8 masses to 10^13 masses. Whew. Theoretically the 5th stage of dark matter would be 10^13 to 10^21 masses. That still leaves us with the 6th stage of the mass of dark matter and quarks. This is the staggering number of 10^21 to 10^34 masses for quarks and dark matter. Wow. This is clearly the end of our Chrysanthemum dark matter models. It is also the end of our hierarchical mass models. What comes after the end of our Electromagnetism model? I dare not postulate. But I suspect outer space models of dark energy. This is the incredible range of from 10^34 to 10^55 masses, a gut wrenching number times the mass of standard model quarks. This is the amount of masses that represents the beginning or the ending of the universe. It's not just a black hole. It's the end. Sorry - not sorry.

Sorry. Physics takes brains and a little training. So dark matter is over 4:34 9iu0 your heads. Too bad. Buy a dog and maybe you'll learn something. Dark matter is the easiest answer. Anyway its easier than reformulating gravity. The evidence of dark matter is overwhelming. Sadly the evidence for the standard model particle of dark matter is completely lacking. Here's the problem. Dark Matter has been around for far longer than standard model particles. Since they are so old and slow moving and neutral and massive they are not found just anywhere. In fact they tend to be found only at the centers of large massive objects like stars and planets and moons and the like. Otherwise, they are found in the halos of galaxies. The exception would seem to be large massive yet fragmented objects, such as the asteroid belt protoplanet between Mars and Jupiter. The masses of dark matter particles may well have several varieties from the least massive and youngest to the most massive and oldest. The least massive and youngest may well fall into the logarithmic scale proportional to that between Gravity and Electromagnetism. This is the hierarchical scale with Hadronic and Leptonic quarks at one end, the bottom end of this scale. This spans 10^36 in a scale proportional to the relative number of dimensions applying to this scale. Clearly there must be several dimensions in this scale. Approximately 7 dimensions seems to be the least massive divisision of this logarithmic scale that makes any sense. Applying a natural scale suggests that at minimum 1/18 of 36 or about 10^2 times as massive as quarks for the least massive initial stages or types of forms of dark matter, while 1/7 of 36 or about 10^5 or more times as massive as quarks for the most massive forms of the initial stages or types of dark matter. Consequentially, small quantities of this novel form of dark matter should be able to be detected, then found, isolated, formally discovered, transported, refined and manufactured. Obviously research and developments in the asteroid belt are going to be instrumental in this discovery. The slow pace of space exploration seems to mean that it's going to be a while before we get this discovery at long last. Of course, the future of dark matter doesn't really begin until its formal discovery, so we'll have to wait till then, whenever that may be. part 2 Ok. So the Chrysanthemum or Mum, sometimes called the Mon when depicted in art, can now be understood in terms of highly temporary but sometimes long lived quark models. It is sometimes well established that early versions of the mum were constricted within 2 dimensions. They were strongly limited, apparently limited to about 21 petals, as predicted by Fibonnacci. However, in later Mon depictions, full blown 3 dimensional mums have been depicted and are apparently grown and are flourishing. These are much larger than previous 2 dimensional models. In counterpart, quark models in the standard model have far exceeded the dark matter models contemplated. For instance, Charm quarks are over 600 times larger than standard Up quarks, and Bottom quarks are over 400 times bigger than standard Strange quarks. In previous models of the Fibonacci model of quark expansion, the numbers (10^2 to 10^5) are well known and within the known potential of this dimension of dark matter. We can expect this dimension of dark matter stable components within isolated dark matter, such as within isolated galactic halos. However, trapped dark matter components such as within stars, planets and moons may be decaying quickly, as exhibited by our own Moon, which has shut down and become locked in its gravitationally stabilized orbit, and the planets Mercury and perhaps even Mars, which apparently have also slowed down, and headed for stopping. This energetic model is shocking, and further dark matter and similar quark models, may be decaying or already gone, so the Mum/Mon model will be an important strategic exploration and investigation. I like the Chrysanthemum model for quarks anyway. It depicts the exponential growth of standard model quarks that we have already seen. However, I think we will see a plateauing of such quark expansions, I think the upper limit of further discoveries such as within the Cern Large Hadron Collider may be reached at about 10,000 times the mass of standard model Up quarks. Spoiler Alert: There may be some new quarks within this range. However, some dimensions or ranges of dark matter quarks may already have expired and would only be available at galactic scales of discovery and investigation. So dark matter research may still have local frontiers to discover, but may stall at this range. The good news is that we have an extremely long time to do this research and discovery of standard model quarks before dark energy expansion catches up with us. Relax. It's cool. I hope that you have enjoyed this Fibonacci mathematical Chrysanthemum experiment in both quarks and dark matter. Thank you for reading. part 3 Ok. So we are now assuming the Fibonnacci based Chrysanthemum model of hyperdimensional dark matter and quarks. Or we still have sluggards or Luddites who can't keep up. In this assumptive model, this structure suggests that such matter would be in the range of 10^5 to 10^8 times the mass of standard model quarks. For regular folks this is from 10,000 times to 100,000,000 times this mass. That is really close to the neutron star category of matter. While this may be amusing consider where this is going, the next phase of dark matter and as yet undiscovered quark masses would have to be in the range of 10^13 to 10^21, or 1,000,000,000,000 to 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 quark masses. Is this in the range of black holes yet? Or are we still stalled at very large neutron stars? Again we must pause and consider where we are. The first stages of dark matter is from 10^2 to 10^3 masses, the 2nd stage would be from 10^3 to 10^5 masses, the 3rd stage would be from 10^5 to 10^8 masses, and the 4th stage would be from 10^8 masses to 10^13 masses. Whew. Theoretically the 5th stage of dark matter would be 10^13 to 10^21 masses. That still leaves us with the 6th stage of the mass of dark matter and quarks. This is the staggering number of 10^21 to 10^34 masses for quarks and dark matter. Wow. This is clearly the end of our Chrysanthemum dark matter models. It is also the end of our hierarchical mass models. What comes after the end of our Electromagnetism model? I dare not postulate. But I suspect outer space models of dark energy. This is the incredible range of from 10^34 to 10^55 masses, a gut wrenching number times the mass of standard model quarks. This is the amount of masses that represents the beginning or the ending of the universe. It's not just a black hole. It's the end. Sorry - not sorry.

Thank you for very interesting lecture about the planet 9. Btw I am watching you from Russia

NO it is not, it is a lie bigger than gods are real. Show me dark matter , do not super impose images of bias over galaxies and say here it is . CGI is not reality.

FIRST IF YOU ARE GOING TO STUDY DARK MATTER,,,,YOU WILL HAVE TO UNDERSTAND IT,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,SOMETIMES I WONDER ABOUT SCIENTIST TODAY,,,,,,,,,,,,,,THE BLACK THAT ATTACKS CEMENT EVERYDAY AROUND THE PLANET,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,CAN JUST ONE OF YOU TRY TO EXPLANE THIS,,,,THE BLACK THAT ATTACKS WOOD THEN EATS IT ,,,,,,,,,,,,WHEN YOU ARE READY TO UNDERSTAND DARK MATTER,,,,,,,,,,,,,,LET ME KNOW,,,,,,,,,,,WOW

12:07. "DM rarely interacts with itself or normal matter " ? . I thought the whole point of the hypothesis was DM 's apparent continuous gravitational pull on normal matter?

Could do without the three minutes of silly noise at start.

String theory failed at least partially too

I would like to share my theory like this someday, hopefully someone discovers the same thing well before I find time to plan and share it.

En una libreta ocservar y apuntar las similitudes y diferencias hasta comprender el orden y desorden 🤔

Precio del libro ?

The Jet coming out of accreting black holes and visual pictures of BH show magnetic lines of forces, as in gluon, reminds me of Susskind's glue balls, implying that mass of a BH is composed of strings, wrapped around infinite curvature leading to bundles of strings, that somehow makes branes/sheets etc. Just kidding.

Gracias por tan valiosa información!

I essentially agree with Dr. Pavel Kroupa on the dark matter notion versus MOND issue being a scientific crisis. Obviously, the key step to convince the scientific community adhering to the dark matter paradigm is to construct the new paradigm consistent with both the facts confirming the old paradigm and the data confirming MOND, the new paradigm based on the full-fledged modification of General Relativity - a new GR (!). I myself being a particle physicist am working on a new GR for now. The dark matter paradigm can indeed become a funding bias.

As I expected, Dr. Sabine Hossenfelder says that MOND is missing generally covariant completion and that she is more on a theory side of General Relativity. Likewise, l think, Einstein's response to MOND would be: "Is MOND a limit case of any gravitational field equation in Reimann space? Does MOND go beyond Riemann geometry?" Nonetheless, the modifications of General Relativity seem to be preferable to the idea of dark matter. Of course, considering the covariant version of εij tensor - εμν - was a consistent theoretical step. As we know, superfluid has zero viscosity, just as geometric space does: in geometric space, there is no friction between spots. So, superfluid is space-like, so to speak, unlike a bunch of particles, where there is internal movement resistance. Therefore, it is logical that introducing superfluid dark matter yields the picture that looks like MOND more than the situation of the bunch of dark matter PARTICLES. I have come up with two mathematical modifications of General Relativity - one for a rotating body like a galaxy and rotating black hole and the other for the general case where the Riemann tensor can be defined differently and somewhat freely at each point of the space. Can the second one be useful for quantum gravity? The second one is in a sketch form, and the first one I wrote a year ago, but I have not yet published both. I am going to publish a paper about all of this. But before publishing, I think it is reasonable to submit my ideas to the specialist whom I trust - Dr. Sabine Hossenfelder. May I?

Dark it is because it is an alien to us type of energy and out of phase of our normal luxons energy and spacetime. What make you think that the only type of energy in our universe is our matter and light? What if dark matter and dark energy is superluminal energy and su;perluminal spacetime.

Sounds like a fudge factor is accepted in science.

The problem identified here is clear. Cosmologists, indeed all current science as practiced today is myopic. With an eye on finding funding, so they may find steady employment all but the brave fear looking anywhere but straight ahead. The solution is obvious.

Gatekeeper.

Germans always outshine others in the physics and science. The US was keen to capture and employ the Third Reich scientists. Most of them lived out their lives in wealth and comfort. It pays to smart folks. If we could choose our ethnicity I would pick German for sure, I am a lowly descendant of Welsh immigrants to America.

Saludos y muchas gracias por compartir!

Now, I've thought this very same thing for a long time. Space however "enpty" is indeed never empty. Even the so-called virtual particles do have mass, no matter how instantaneously they appear from nothing in empty space and annihilate each other as instantaneously. Cosmologists aver on one hand that all mass and particles are connected in the Universe and affect each other, (Entanglement) but on the other hand treat mass and gravity as a finite local event, ignoring those very same virtual particles as well as any matter scattered in between. I've never understood that. The Hubble tension is the result of a nonsensical interpretation of what we don't know how to describe or understand. And don't get me started on the electron in a hydrogen atom rigamarole. They're still trying to measure the mass/energy quantity to 10 decimal places that change every year, that first disagrees then magically agree with predicted results, using undeciferable methods like Feynman diagrams and chromodynamics, et al. "Shut up and calculate" Feynman said when questioned on his methodology. Methinks these hidebound physicists today are in need of a dogmatic enema by a young Einsteinian like character.

Excelente programa gracias, si señores preparar la humanidad gracias , Bogotá Colombia

Muchas gracias por tan importante información, Bogota Colombia

"Si existen los extraterrestres, Oh, seria increíble. Si estamos solos, Oh seria increíble." Carl Sagan

Why does gravity have to be the only organizing force?

I feel like the story about the aliens was some kind of metaphor

it’s not dark, if anything it’s transparent. I think we don’t understand gravity on the galactic scale. does dark matter induce curvature. of course “dark matter” solves many problems, it should, it’s tailor made.

What if an already supermassive black hole could grow in the void? A black hole hosted by a galaxy will not get very much bigger than 30 or 50 billion solar masses. At least, it will not grow indefinitely. But what if a black hole's mass could continue to grow in the void? One heavily criticized paper wrote about black holes gaining mass due to cosmological coupling. The claims seemed dubious. But what if a black hole could continue to grow in the void? Let's say, just as a thought experiment, that it is possible. Assume i) that a supermassive black hole is formed when the universe is somewhat dense, ii) survives into a later phase of the universe dominated by dark energy, iii) continues to grow and grow in the void, due to iv) some opposite effect being more important than Hawking radiation. Could such a black hole explode if it got big enough? In the absence of quantum gravity and a Theory of Everything, how do we know for sure? Let's imagine that en unconceivable massive black hole explodes in the void. Could it be like The Big Bang? The point is, that if it grew in the void, it could perhaps explode into the void. Could this have mathematical similarities with the Big Bang assumedly emerging from vacuum fluctuations? Could cosmic inflation be like spatial distortion giving back its energy, instead of spacetime actually being created or torn apart? It the Big Bang were connected to black holes more or less like this, the multiverse would be on the scientific menu. ("A universe" conceived as the amount of energy released in a too-big-to-fail black-hole-explosion, the multiverse conceived as the infinitely many universes, all in the same spacetime, just like regular black holes occupy the same spacetime.) (Without quantum effects, black holes could not emit energy and in the void only grow. Hawking radiation is a quantum effect. Are we sure it is the only one? Could there also be a quantum effects causing black holes to grow?)

Confirmation that the Mambo is a cosmological constant.

Genial..genial poder conocer un gran físico y astrónomo en mi época. Adoro a este ser especial en un tiempo en el cual la humanidad NECESITA ser educada....felicitaciones profesor Avi Loeb..SALUDOS DESDE CHILE

The actual comet Nishimura has a seeming retrograde and hyperbolic trajectory, so this is almost certainly an exo comet, in that sense a "solar system visiting exo-comet" (ssv-exocomet) not to get confused with big exocomets around other stars. So why won't we add an E, an e or an I before the C/2023 to mark those other exocomets? Since the solar system is turnt more then 60° (degrees) away from the main level of the milky way, and hardly anyone would say if a trajectory has 180° too much (or too few) in the calculations, seeming retrogrades could easily be mistaken for progrades aswell as the opposite. Almost like with Uranus where i don't know yet if the pole directing to the sun would have been the old north pole (more realistic) or the old/ancient south pole (also possible), Venus is just flipped over by 180 degrees. Additional descriptions like pseudo-retrograde or possibly pseudo-prograde aswell as ssv-exocomet would be quite helpful, but will we ever "get there"? Two thirds of the prograde comets will be correct as labeled, but also finding out if some asteroids visit us from outside of the Oort cloud (perhaps also being pseudo-retrograde ssv-asteroids) would furthely add up.

It is possible to derive the Tully-Fisher from Newton's law as well- with some fiddling.. see this which take a=a0 at large distances; a=GM/r^2=v^2/r; Giving; v^4= GM/r *GM/r=G *(GM/r^2)*M=(G a0) M; or v^4 ∝ M, QED.